SWM wrote:I'm curious what gives you that impression. My impression was that Oyster Bay was specifically designed to take advantage of the stealth capabilities of the spider drive. It used spider drive missiles, spider drive spy ships, and spider drive missile control platforms. I don't see any way that the tactical goals could have been achieved without the spider drive. The entire operation depended on it.
The operation as executed depended on it yes.
There´s also the question whether it was meant to be executed by spider drive ships, or ships employing spider drives, or ships employing weapons or weapons packets with spider drives.
No i don´t disagree that they needed that stealth as part of most potential strikes, but it´s not completely absolute that it must be the main platforms relying 100% on spider drives.
SWM wrote: There is no evidence at all that Oyster Bay was planned before the spider drive was invented.
There is also no evidence to the contrary, making a statement either way purely an assumption.
SWM wrote:I'd also like to hear how the Shark could be considered a testbed for the Detweiler if the Detweiler were not a spider drive ship.
Depends on what they were specifically meant to test. It could for example be a test of their ability to build reliable ships in whatever shipyards they created for this production. Doing something big undercover can be a lot trickier than doing it as a "normal" nation.
There´s also the question if the Dets are purely spider drive, combination or no spider drive at all.
Or whether they use a next generation of the spider drive, OR a radically different drive alltogether, possibly a derivative of the spider drive.
SWM wrote:I will grant that we do not have absolute proof that the Detweiler is a spider drive ship. But I think the evidence is a lot stronger than you admit.
Actually, the evidence is extremely weak.
The only thing that actually suggests it at all is if we make the assumption that the Sharks reason for acting as testbed ships, is the spider drive. And if that was true and the only reason then there was a need for ONE, possibly TWO Shark class ships. Because if there is a need for a testbed for the spider drive for the Detweilers, then what you NEED, is a fullsized ship, otherwise you can´t actually be certain, as a lot of tech doesn´t scale 1:1.
Basic problem is, MA isn´t stupid, and as far as we know, building LARGE warships with spider drives, are stupid.
Not to mention that RFC isn´t stupid, which means he should have something "fun" prepared.
Basically, we know that remaining unseen with a big ship is difficult(more precisely, the larger the ship, the harder it is) as long as anyone bothers to look for it, and once they´ve used their stealth fun ( as in OB ), everyone else knows to look and look HARD.
Reaching MDM range by using spider drive ships may be possible, but that´s still a LOT of flight time for missiles, plenty of time for defenders to bring up their defences and retaliate, because once they KNOW where to start looking, big ships without wedges are going to be relatively easy to track.
And lack of sidewalls and wedges is a drawback that by all facts so far, just cannot be made up for by reduced visibility.
It´s in many ways a lot like current real world stealth, nice to have but very rarely worth the pricetag, because once the opposition started figuring out how to deal with it, there´s lots of counters.
IF, the ships could for example, fluently transit to/from hyper, especially without an emergence signature, then the spider drive might allow some much nastier tactics.
But that´s highly doubtful.