cthia wrote:At any rate, I can't think of a single reason that Eighth and Third were chained to Trevor's Star. Can anyone think of a reason? There must have been a strategic or tactical reason for that deployment. At least during normal times. Which, of course, should have been overruled or rethought in light of the reality which existed after unveiling Apollo.
tlb wrote:I think that you are being unclear again. The wormhole connecting Manticore to Trevor's Star is the most important one for the war effort. It was hard won and absolutely must be protected. Any force at the Trevor's Star end can quickly return to Manticore. Any force At Trevor's Star can quickly strike at Haven, while having an untouchable supply line.
So please expound on this; what are you trying to say?
cthia wrote:You said it yourself ...
tlb wrote:You are correct that the Admiralty should have done things differently. Whether it was shuffling the forts or moving Third Fleet to the Manticore side of the junction (or both), while keeping Eighth close to Trevor's Star or exercising other options that we can only guess.
I thought this was another example of something that should be obvious in my post.
tlb wrote:No, because the plain meaning of what you said was that was no reason to have forces at Trevor's Star, even before revealing Apollo. You are asking why a force was kept there in normal times and saying that you cannot think of a reason for doing so.
My post on reshuffling, still had Eighth close to the Trevor's Star junction.
Let me expound on this as you asked and perhaps make it clearer by injecting that missing logic chain.
First, I apologize that my wording may have suggested that I think Trevor's Star should be abandoned. Heck no! After that whacking and branding Hamish took at the hands of McQueen??? Ok, strike that last rib at Hamish that isn't quite true.
At any rate, what I meant to ask is why did Trevor's Star need
both 8th and 3rd when a Case Zulu should be expected?
Consider this ...
Theemile wrote:Let's not forget, Eighth Fleet is not a defensive formation - Home and 3rd are. Eighth Fleet is an offensive fleet using Trevor's Star (the closest operating base of the Star Kingdom relative to Haven) as a forward operating base. Eighth is only there to refit, repair and plan between ops - it's use as a backup defensive formation is at best Tertiary to it's other responsibilities.
Each op will probably take Eighth fleet away from Trevor's Star between 4 and 6 weeks. It's likely that in the year and a half between when Honor took command of Eighth, and BoMa, the Fleet was probably on station ~50% of the time, and a majority of that was refitting and repairing - and until the last several months, she didn't have the firepower to appreciably enhance the forces arrayed in Home and 3rd Fleet.
Eighth Fleet is not a defensive formation - Home and 3rd are.
Eighth is only there to refit, repair and plan between ops - it's use as a backup defensive formation is at best Tertiary to it's other responsibilities.
In light of Theemile's post -- in retrospect -- it is logical that 8th and 3rd are both positioned at Trevor's Star. Trevor's Star is too important not to protect. Someone has to do it. So I suppose 3rd Fleet inherited that responsibility, and 8th Fleet was only there to refit and repair Honor's torn undies. (And her "slip" was showing too.)
The fact that it was a necessity that Honor be at Trevor's Star for repairs is something that I missed. Honor at Trevor's Star wasn't actually a deployment.
But let's take a closer look at Kuzak. Kuzak was closer to the junction than Honor. I am perplexed by Kuzak's close proximity to the junction instead of being positioned closer to the planet. I am assuming I missed a memo? I know that the junction is important, but wouldn't San Martin lobby for protection; which should imply a position closer to the planet? Unless there was a contingent in orbit about the planet.
But my main point is that Honor's tertiary obligations should have been moved to the front burner in light of the current conditions.
But beyond even that. I am questioning what should be Honor's optimum positioning even if she had been moved to the MBS. Should she have remained close to the MWJ so she could quickly support Trevor's Star if she had been moved to the Home System and Kuzak had to respond from Trevor's Star?
Why wouldn't Honor have taken up a position in orbit right along with Home Fleet? Remember, anything else would invite defeat in detail.
And if Honor
had been in orbit with Home Fleet, then would she be in command of the play to run? She would be subordinate to Home Fleet wouldn't she? Hence, at D'Orville's mercy. Yet, we know who is the better strategist / tactician. There was no way D'Orville was qualified to handle Apollo.
You think the above is all that irks me? There's more. Haven supposedly brought along two of its finest tacticians. Tourville and Chin. They had to go the long way around, but they still managed to support the operation with two separate fleets. No big deal, it is par for the course.
Yet the RMN only had one tactician more to await them. And two of them weren't even at HOME at the time to welcome them. The great big MBS only had one additional tactician at the party than the RHN. Let us investigate further.
- Flt. Adm. D'Orville
- Home FLT
- Adm. Kuzak,
Vice Adm. Truman
- 3rd FLT
- Adm. Harrington - 8th FLT
Which means, the galaxy's most premiere navy only had two tacticians at Home during what should have been an expected all-out-attack by Haven. A Case Zulu.
The two tacticians in the hot seat were D'Orville, who at best should have been retired, and who obviously had a poor appreciation for strategy and tactics. Heck, he had had his bell rang by Honor during the war games; a reality which may have been the smoking gun (
smoking grav lance) that he had outlived his usefulness.
Then there was Alice Truman. Alice is a heavy hitter tactically, as far as I am concerned. And my placement of her on my list in a certain thread supports it. But! Personally, I have always thought Alice's talents were wasted. She should have had her own fleet, instead of a CLAC command. So, a poor use of her talents disqualifies her as a significant (for lack of a better word, like, say, competent) tactician in the hot seat.
So, the MBS was weak in the firepower available to the navy, weak on the number of tacticians standing guard at the gate, weak in the
choice of tacticians and / or their command, thus weak in strategy and tactics.
Which places an exclamation point on why I stand by the notion that Henke should have been recalled. Or someone else during this delicate window of vulnerability.