penny wrote:It isn't a matter of whether the reporters “get to know” those things. It is a matter that they need to know those things as far as Honor was concerned. And of course, Beth as well. For political and legal reasons. Again, Honor was trying to expose this entity. And she needed to be able to produce credible witnesses in case something went wrong. To be a credible witness, there needs to be firsthand knowledge of everything. Or the witness’ testimony will be inadmissible. “You weren't there!” If Honor could not ensure that, then where is the proof? And why bring them in the first place?
Everything you're saying is true but it does not mean the press gets to know
everything. Conversations with the enemy, how Honor demanded their surrender, how they rebuffed it, admitted to being the Alignment, and sent missiles as a reply, sure. How Honor dealt with the civilian habitats and avoided hitting them, sure. How the Galton Navy attacked
after surrendering, that too. And how the GF is dealing with the POWs and investigations (at a high level), I agree.
Intra-fleet commands, no. There's no reason the press needs to know that and a lot of reasons why they should never learn that. It's not important to the goal and to how the GA is treating fairly the losers. Raw sensor data, much less. Fleet readiness status, before, during and after the battles? Forget it.
Anyway, something did go wrong. There was no smoking gun. There were no weapons of mass destruction. So now, can't the GA get sued? Where are the reparations?
Galton opened fire first. They started the hostilities. Neither they nor anyone else on their behalf gets to sue.
Oh, they will find some proof too. They will find a lot of people who were whisked away from Mesa during Houdini. They will find plans for the streak drive and very likely the nanites too. They will find the plans for the Cataphract, which will show where those were first created and then given to the League -- not to mention the People's Navy in Exile! -- to stir up problems.
They won't find everything and they will come to the conclusion that Galton was not the ultimate hideout. But there's no doubt they will prove Galton was a MAlign hideout.
I fully expected someone's counterargument – about whether lots of reporters should have been sent to Galton – to be to ensure at least one reporter lived. Markusscaber suggested one reporter per ship. That would ensure that at least one reporter survived, but Honor does not need a hostile witness. Doh! I get it now. LOL But isn't that cold and calculating? Virtually throwing the reporters under the bus. Yeah, I see where this conversation is headed.
I still think that reporters aboard warships during battle are the exception, not the rule. Audrey was special and maybe one or two more also got invited to travel aboard Invictus. The vast majority of embedded press was in the fleet train, possibly aboard Marine transports, which was staying in hyper while the naval battle was going on.
Picture this. Honor's armsmen and a gaggle of reporters.
Didn't happen.