akira.taylor wrote:My understanding of the Harrington Doctrine (which, I admit may be wrong) is that Manticore really doesn't want any power which will be able to simply dictate terms to its neighbors. As long as the significant powers look at each other and say "a war would be painful and expensive," things will be more or less okay. At least, if there are enough "significant powers." Now, one power might be able to take any given other power - but if it can't take them all (or even two or three) working together, it won't want to try (yes, there will be border skirmishes, crazy leaders, and similar stuff, but not OFS).
Does that make sense to everyone, or am I incomprehensible today?
I think the mutual defense treaties signed with the SEM will mean that any of those successor states will be committed to fighting both their target
and the SEM if they want to mess with that other successor state, and that the amounts of power among the weakest successor state, the strongest, and the SEM, will discourage that sort of adventurism.
Think of it less as a Warsaw Pact and more as Pax Manticore.