

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
Nope, if your use for them doesn't require a heavily armored and armed ship it's almost certainly not a good plan. If it requires any modifications other than trivial surface modifications it is almost certainly a bad plan. It's probably not a good plan even then, but there is at least a chance.
They are obsolete and only suitable to give to people you kind of like who otherwise would have nothing, and these people need to be willing to do a whole lot of work. They are still obsolete, but most of the warships in the galaxy are just as obsolete. |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Brigade XO
Posts: 3238
|
I was thinking more along the lines of your typical ship-breaker/scrap dealer use of them
take them to pieces and use the materials for blending with other materials for other uses. It appears that the armor is "grown" in place using nannies. Don't know what you would use to chop the armor up into chunks or billets small enough to be reprocessed. Also don't know if there is a workable process to use armor- particularly Solly armor- in combination with other materials to make something usefull. There are a couple of ways to do this, one being melting said armor, adding the apropriate materials to change the chemical composition and then forming what you need. If that could be feedstock for the nannies, wonderfull. Another way - possibly usable in the honorers- would be a different set of nannies to break down the armor to some level of component materials and use that to make something else. There is the not so minor problem with that approch that those type of nannies would make both an interesting weapon and a very bad plague on technology if they escaped. Having you starship or space station start to be effectivly eaten by a what would be a robotic virus is not something I would like to be dealing with. A starship's version of Ebola. In any case, you have very large lumps of millions of tons of material, mostly metals of various sorts plus whatever is being used in the electronics and while not being in a pure form of anything in particular, does represent a bunch of essential raw material to recycle and use to build usefull things. |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Jonathan_S
Posts: 9127
|
Wasn't that grown in place armor described as a fairly new technique for the RMN when HMS Nike (BC-413) was getting repaired at Hancock station? (New enough that Paul though they should adjust their SOP for pulling a reactor based on his new approach?) It's quite possible that the older SLN SDs might not have that kind of grown armor. In which case it might be a bit easier to remove the main armor belts (though not all the interior cofferdaming) OTOH I guess it's possible the technology originally came out of the League - say as a way of running up the armor cost giving cost-plus contractors more profits. ![]() |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Relax
Posts: 3230
|
Grown armor is simply going to be stronger per tonnage. The ships will not be any stronger, but on a per ton basis they will be as they will not require fasteners and the resulting crack propagation mediation required around fasteners(stress risers). On the other hand, it makes repair much harder. On the other hand fasteners/welding/melding/etc equal faster build rates, than build in place nanobots. Can get more bots building or people hands on a 3d object when the surface area or physical building space is increased. Why submarines/ships are built in sections and then assembled together instead of "stick built" in place as was done before 1940. _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Spacekiwi
Posts: 2634
|
I suppose you could just put them through a wedge and distribute the materials by gravity, then rebuild from the new materials. no grey goo growth either.....
`
![]() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ its not paranoia if its justified... ![]() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
I don't think either the SLN ships or older RMN ships had armor grown in place. The text specifically states that armor that was not grown in place was in sections that could be pulled to gain access, which was why the Book specified coming in from the side instead of the top or bottom of a ship when replacing a component that couldn't be removed through hatches. The introduction of grown armor caused a change in how yard dogs gained access in order to replace to outsize, deeply buried components in ships. Remember that the SLN is the most conservative navy in existence, with an inherent distrust of anything newfangled, as well as the Not Invented Here syndrome. I think that the RMN was probably the first navy to use armor that was grown in place. Italics are the author's, boldface is my emphasis. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
biochem
Posts: 1372
|
Also a big part of the SL Fleet 2000 plan was to make the fleet plug and play to allow for easy upgrading, so they would have designed those ships for easy repair access to simplify removal of outdated modules and the installation of new ones.
|
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Theemile
Posts: 5393
|
But the SDs we have seen are not new designs - they are Scientists and Vegas - a >200 year old design. Fleet 2000 merely gave them some internal facelifts with their some of their electronics replaced with modular racks. The new Nevada BCs and Mikasa CAs are supposedly more "plug and play", but we've never been told how much - but I doubt that you can change out grasers or misisle tubes all that easily. ******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships." |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Relax
Posts: 3230
|
Blue highlighted flies directly in the face of reality. Chuck up one more Honorversism. In catastrophic damage, the joints almost never fail as fasteners are always doubled up for crack propagation requirements due to fatigue. In some rare instances it is possible, but overall? No. Only reason welded armor today on ships is preferred over fastened armor is because of a little thing called water. It helps keep the ship afloat. Tanks on the other hand are welded because they are so thin that adding all that extra structural mass for fasteners would literally add "tons" to the design. Welding and grown in place ARE lighter. What it is NOT is "vastly improved integrity against damage." In many instances, allowing the "ends" of a structural member to "float" via fasteners is actually MORE damage tolerant than welding as it allows more DEFLECTION and therefore more ENERGY ABSORPTION. Anyways, for anyone actually interested in reality ![]() _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Light bulb Captured Solly fleet | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Joat42
Posts: 2165
|
It all depends on the material the armor is constructed of and how it behaves under stress and how it absorbs energy. Theoretically you could use cotton for armor, it just have to be a very very thick layer but there would be no need for joints and fasteners. ![]() --- Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer. Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool. |
Top |