biochem wrote:
In the case of the US, locals which are more socialist (California for example) also tend to be economic trainwrecks with a lot more similarities to Greece than to Sweden. So while small government isn't perfect, as a practical matter it really works a lot better for the USA.
One of the reasons smaller government works better goes all the way back to the Greeks of Athens. In Montana, if I do not like a particular piece of legislation at the city, county or state level I can get in my iron horse, go to where whichever particular legislative body meets and stand up on my hind legs to get up on my high horse. I can have a direct impact on the legislative process as it happens. This is not true in all the states of the United States. In some of them, you must be a registered lobbyist to speak to a committee.
The more direct input to the process from the people it will affect, the more likely it is to be acceptable to those people. One of the reasons that the US Congress currently has such a poor rating is that the people do not believe their voice is being heard. Until the US has some way to monitor the opinions of the people on a country wide basis in nearly real time and get those results to the pertinent Congressmen in a timely fashion as well as being shown to the people as a whole, that opinion will continue.