Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 99 guests

Honorverse ramblings and musings

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:09 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Duckk wrote:Don't know where you're not getting the lack of pride in the SLN from. This whole confrontation is rooted in the SLN's hubris. But there's a difference between pride in what you do, and making a rational decision to not get shot over an issue you have no control over or affect the resolution of. As The E brought up, it's no different than a bank teller surrendering to a robber's demands.

It's my darn patriotic pride Duckk. Causes probs for me all the time. LOL

Regardless though, why does an officer join the navy if he has so little respect for it? I really have a prob with that. I know that there is corruption within the League and its navy, but public perception has to remain as unjaded and naive as mine - or the navy is lost. And snotties are post-public. Years in SLN service may later jade him - but at some point most officers had to have some military integrity.

And respectfully, on the heels of that, I can't accept that it would be the same as a bank teller handing over her booty. Bank tellers are trained to hand over the money. The money, that is insured, isn't worth their lives.

A military officer's duty is to die protecting and doing his job. Not in the manner of Santino mind you, yet handing over ACS for the asking isn't either.

I do understand that they shouldn't die in the manner of Santino. Yet I don't think the RMN would have fired on an unarmed civilian platform. I was just wondering why they were not forced to take other military action - like a boarding party and hand to hand combat. Or pulser to pulser combat.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Duckk   » Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:48 am

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4201
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

Joining the Navy does not equate to blindly committing suicide. Honor ordered McKeon to surrender at Adler. She did so because there was nothing he could have done to affect the outcome. It wasn't worth the expenditure of lives to go out fighting. Neither of them were sanctioned for that. And the consequences of that decision in that situation were far more grave than handing over any dinky ACS platform. There is nothing worth dying over in a ACS station - no tech, no strategic or tactical data, nothing. So what is so dang important about a ACS platform that they would all cheerfully go get themselves massacred?
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:15 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Duckk wrote:Joining the Navy does not equate to blindly committing suicide. Honor ordered McKeon to surrender at Adler. She did so because there was nothing he could have done to affect the outcome. It wasn't worth the expenditure of lives to go out fighting. Neither of them were sanctioned for that. And the consequences of that decision in that situation were far more grave than handing over any dinky ACS platform. There is nothing worth dying over in a ACS station - no tech, no strategic or tactical data, nothing. So what is so dang important about a ACS platform that they would all cheerfully go get themselves massacred?

Apples and oranges. The scenario with Honor involved a military target against a military target. Commander Pang would have been firing on a civilian target. I imagined that these targets are taken less forcefully. Firing on an unarmed civilian target isn't good for any navy unless they are firing themselves. I can't even imagine Commander Yau-pau suggesting that he'd fire on an unarmed civilian platform. Remember how much fuss was made when it was thought that the RMN fired on a civilian space station, Giselle I think it was? A civilian target laid waste was in part what caused the war in the first place.

No matter. I won't force you to beat me up over this one particular disconnect of mine.

Thanks all.

One question though, probably not the SLN's, but does Manty platforms have grasers. Do forgive the snotty question and all of the classes I missed in all of the technical threads.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Duckk   » Wed Jun 01, 2016 12:24 pm

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4201
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

If they are unarmed stations, then there absolutely is a resolution to the situation that does not involve blowing said station out of space. It's unarmed, so it has literally zero ability to resist boarding. Destroying ACS would be the last resort to intransigence, not the first.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:14 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 9053
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Duckk wrote:If they are unarmed stations, then there absolutely is a resolution to the situation that does not involve blowing said station out of space. It's unarmed, so it has literally zero ability to resist boarding. Destroying ACS would be the last resort to intransigence, not the first.
Yep. As I think I mentioned early ARC isn't a military installation. There may be military people assigned to it but it's really a cross between air traffic control and a harbor pilot (except you don't need a physical pilot to come aboard; just a data dump of the current charts / conditions).

So even the military people assigned there likely have nothing more that personal sidearms; and enlisted military not even that. Depending on the size of the station maybe a few police or MPs who might have an arms locker with some long arms; and maybe, maybe, some unpowered light armor (just basic bulletproof vests).

Though customs enforcement might be collocated on the same station; and they might have an armed cutter or pinnace and a few long guns; but likely still no power armor or crew served weapons.


They'd be able to do jack all about a armed naval boarding party. Nor, as you said, is there anything much sensitive for them to protect. Maybe they've got some low security crypto codes for talking semi-securely with the planet or military ships, maybe there's some data about expected transits of military units. But a quick computer scrub would clear all that out, and it's considered routine to wipe computers when offering a surrender. (If it was a Mantie ACS it might have protocols to talk to Hermes bouys; but likely wouldn't have onboard FTL comms capability. But that's just one more piece of computer data to scrub.)


Which is a longwinded way of agreeing that there's nothing on there that's worth dying over. Just like we wouldn't expect US Coast Guard assigned to operate a lighthouse to fight to the death in its defense against an overwhelming numbers in an amphibious or helicopter invasion. Wipe any secure radios, burn any maps or notes with sensitive information and if practical attempt to escape. If escape is impossible surrender rather than pulling out their sidearms and going down in a hail of gunfire or artillery/aerial fire support.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by lyonheart   » Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:22 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi The E,

Kudos for the good points as usual, and to everyone else for theirs as well.

Cthia seems to have forgotten the whole point Lacoon I & II was possible in the first place is because the RMN knows to SL termini are undefended [including the local ACS stations] because it has almost 5 centuries of data to prove that's the case.

Remember also how old Case Lacoon is, (around a couple of centuries apparently) when the RMN was far smaller, yet Lacoon I; providing the MMM a secure safe exit from the SL, was always considered fairly easy, mainly because the SLN response time was too great and the local forces to small to effectively interfere with the RMN forces dispatched; ie they probably being as large as needed to intimidate them as necessary, ie heavy cruisers versus light cruisers or destroyers, battle-cruisers against heavy cruisers etc.

Pang Yau-pau had 2 Sag-C's, a Roland and the older Chanson DD class Othello, then [until retconned] just over twice the tonnage of Chalker's 6 Rampart DD's [@97,000 tons = 582 KT to 1240 KT] which is the only thing Chalker probably understood, probably because the fact that Pang's actual combat superiority was orders of magnitude greater was incomprehensible to him.

Aside: the fact that the Rampart DD's are so much bigger that the Chanson's [85 KT in OBS] that were RMN state of the art in 1901 is an interesting factoid, and makes one wonder how big the 'War Harvest' class is tonnage wise when other references imply they're a bit smaller than the comparable RMN types.

Again, the SL is far too big, NTM too powerful for anyone to ever dare interfere with any part of it, so why bother providing any kind of expensive defenses?

Given the corruption now evident in 7th Fleet for a dozen years or so, those SLN officers stuck at an ACS were probably skimming along with everyone else.

Again kudos to all the responders.

L


The E wrote:
cthia wrote:How was Commander Pang Yau-pau able to gain control of ACS without a fight? A navy can't just have control of its terminii handed over so easily for the asking. Now I know that ACS is a civilian agency in the RMN and you can't expect them to resist force. Yet I don't imagine that control of a Manty ACS is going down like that.


I am not sure what sort of ships Yau-Pau was commanding at the time, but I am pretty sure that he is more than capable of overpowering any picket force. I think it's like tellers at a bank being ordered to comply with robber's demands; it's easier to give in to their demands now and wait for proper relief forces than it is to throw away ships and lives in a pointless attempt at resistance.

The other thing to keep in mind is that while a normal wormhole terminus is a very important strategic concern for the system it is in, none of the other termini or junctions come close to being as important for their systems as the MWJ is for Manticore. The only reason Laocoon could work is because the wormholes in SLN space aren't picketed or fortified heavily, after all.


I assume that since OFS hand-picked the staff, that they were not civilian in nature in the League, or at least in this instance - which suggests that ACS would not have been so easily handed over to neobarbs by arrogant OFS officers who detest everything Manticoran without a fight. Which would have forced the Manty commander to fire on a civilian platform.


If the choice is between getting killed in a hail of pulser fire or by contact nuke and complying until relief forces can arrive, what do you think a solarian officer is going to do? Especially one described as being more than a little corrupt?

Do you honestly expect any SLN officer in such a position to go all "for the honor of the flag!"?

I guess I'm shocked that control of one (of the League's so few) terminii can be so easily obtained.


Why? The SL didn't have any wars inside its territory for close to a millennium, as anyone knows that Ýou Do Not Mess With The League. As an analogy, consider a busy highway crossing. Sure, if some gang decided to take it over and impose tariffs, they could do that, but only for as long as it takes to mobilize a sufficiently large police force. There's no need to post armed guards at the crossing, because everyone knows that trying something stupid like taking it over is a quick trip to the morgue.

What thorny question is that?


I'm guessing he doesn't want to be yelled at by the SLN idiots for whatever he had to do. Maybe he just handcuffed them all in a cargo hold, maybe he ordered them to get to the escape pods and get off that way, it doesn't really matter. If the SLN commander doesn't care about their safety, well, that probably says more about the SLN and how much it cares about its people than it does about Yau-Pau's conduct.
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Annachie   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 5:43 am

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

I've always wondered. A planet that has only 1 possible religion, and that was unvisited by strangers for 800 years, has a tradition for seating non-believers in it's cathedrals.

Seriously how many non-believers could they possibly have had want to attend a church service?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Weird Harold   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 5:55 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Annachie wrote:I've always wondered. A planet that has only 1 possible religion, and that was unvisited by strangers for 800 years, has a tradition for seating non-believers in it's cathedrals.

Seriously how many non-believers could they possibly have had want to attend a church service?


In 800 years, there's bound to be a significant number of rebellious teens, agnostics, and outright atheists. But those people are going to have friends and relatives getting married, baptizing children, and being eulogized at funerals. Some of those non-believers are going to accept invitations to attend those church functions.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:49 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
Annachie wrote:I've always wondered. A planet that has only 1 possible religion, and that was unvisited by strangers for 800 years, has a tradition for seating non-believers in it's cathedrals.

Seriously how many non-believers could they possibly have had want to attend a church service?


In 800 years, there's bound to be a significant number of rebellious teens, agnostics, and outright atheists. But those people are going to have friends and relatives getting married, baptizing children, and being eulogized at funerals. Some of those non-believers are going to accept invitations to attend those church functions.

Then they are doing something right. Non-believers are who you want seated in your cathedral. A Christian's duty is to go out into the world and be fishers of men. Why seat only believers in your cathedral? "Lord willing and the creek don't rise," they are already saved.
Question: "What is the significance of Jesus eating with sinners?"

Answer: In Mark 2, soon after calling Matthew to follow Him, Jesus ate a meal with “many publicans and sinners” in Matthew’s house (verse 15). Matthew had been a tax collector (publican), and these were his friends and acquaintances who were now spending time with Jesus (cf. Luke 5:39). The scribes and the Pharisees complained, but Jesus’ actions in spending time with sinners transcended His culture and actually should define Christian culture as we know it.

In Jesus’ day, rabbis and other spiritual leaders were the highest members of Jewish society. Everyone looked up to the Pharisees. They were strict adherents to the Law and tradition, and they avoided those whom they deemed “sinners” because they had a “clean” image to maintain. Tax collectors, infamous for embezzlement and their cooperation with the hated Romans, definitely fell into the “sinner” category.

As Jesus’ ministry grew, so did His popularity among the social outcasts of society. Now that Matthew was part of His inner circle, Jesus naturally had more contact with the pariahs in Matthew’s circle. Spending time with the publicans and sinners was part of Jesus’ mission: “I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners” (Mark 2:17). If Jesus was to reach the lost, He must have some contact with them. He went to where the need was because “it is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.” Praise the Lord, the Great Physician makes house calls.


Remember, God loves sinners. He does not love the sin, but he loves the individual...
John 3:16 tells us, "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." The “world” includes EVERYBODY, even a dirty, rotten, vile sinner like me.
John 3:17
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by darrell   » Sat Jun 11, 2016 12:24 pm

darrell
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1390
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:57 am

Weird Harold wrote:
Annachie wrote:I've always wondered. A planet that has only 1 possible religion, and that was unvisited by strangers for 800 years, has a tradition for seating non-believers in it's cathedrals.

Seriously how many non-believers could they possibly have had want to attend a church service?


In 800 years, there's bound to be a significant number of rebellious teens, agnostics, and outright atheists. But those people are going to have friends and relatives getting married, baptizing children, and being eulogized at funerals. Some of those non-believers are going to accept invitations to attend those church functions.


Personally, I suspect that that is the answer, but here are three other possibilities.

1. the strangers isles were added after contact was re-established with the rest of humanity.

2. The strangers isle was established during the civil war, when the faithful broke from the main church. the Isle was kept as either a reminder or as a way to make sure that a way is always open to invite people back in.

3. There was a strangers isle with churches back on old earth, so tradition says there needs to be a strangers isle today.
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
Logic: an organized way to go wrong, with confidence.
Top

Return to Honorverse