Trump gets another SCOTUS appointment?

Annachie, LOL at your response!

]When a person dances with the Devil (Demoncrats), the Pied Piper came a calling and the Demoncrats had to Dance. The Evil Puppeteers were exposed. Lindsey Graham best expressed my sentiments on the subject.

Doctor Rose, I found many inconsistiences with the her story in relation to Judge Kavanaugh. However, I believe she suffered some sort of trauma (Rape) in her past. I deal with a person who has to deal with serious multiple Rapes and forced Drug Use. Occasionally, my wife has serious nightmares of what happened to her. My wife was sold into Sexual Slavery by the Drug Cartels. Now, my wife does not believe her at all!

Annachie wrote:I'm curious what witch hunt you are talking about?

As for the confirmation hearings, maybe you should have watched it yesterday/thursday.

She came across as highly credible, Kavanaugh as almost deranged.
Even Kavanaugh's wife and mother couldn't believe his behaviour. Or perhaps, that he'd behave that way at such a time.
Seriously, look at the women behind him.

Whereas, aparently, Graham is like Judge Jeanete.
After Sessions' job. And trying to get it the same way.

smr wrote:Now, my wife does not believe her at all!

Good to know that your wife, who is definitely a real person and not just someone you made up, does not believe her.

Now, me, I'm thinking more like this:


(Fun fact: Hillary Clinton, demoness incarnate and Most Guilty Person Of All Time According To smr, was able to withstand days of questions with grace and calmness. Kavanaugh got 20 minutes of hard and personal questions and broke down like an angry baby. Guess who's more credible here?)

Speaking of people not believing Kavanaugh:

Look at these women.


Those are not the faces of people convinced that Kavanaugh is the victim here.

gcomeau wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:We also have laws against defamation, libel and slander in this country. If Kavenaugh fails to get confirmed because of these unsubstantiated accusations, he has good cause to file a lawsuit against the bitch for lost wages and damaged reputation.

He would be laughed out of court... of course the guy who is opposed to having any investigation into these incidents or sworn testimony of witnesses heard or to having himself submitted to a polygraph over them is never in a million years going to file that lawsuit.

Guess why genius.

Kavenaugh's confirmation to his current Judicial position has been prolonged and acrymonious.

Which is a natural consequence of nominating a man like Kavanaugh to such a position in the first place.

Gorsuch is extremely conservative. He practically sailed through. So you don't get to claim this is just the Libs being mean to the right.

Kavanaugh is grossly unfit for this position.

This woman has had abundant opportunity to make her accusations public. She didnt. Why not?

Have you spent the entire freaking #metoo era in sensory deprivation or something? How is it possible you are still clueless enough to ask that question?

Consider the possibility that this woman who IS an extremely partisan Democrat operative decided to weaponize herself by seeking therapy for an imaginary incident that doesnt qualify as a crime committed by an unspecified perpetrator. Then when Trump appoints a SCOTUS nominee who could concievably be connected to the time and place not specified in her vague statements to her therapist, she goes public with the accusations naming the nominee as the alleged perpetrator of the non-crime to sully his reputation.

How much you bet that the Democrats have a stable of studs prepared to accuse any female SCOTUS nominees of being sexually promiscuous? They have a cadre of guys who will attest that any female SCOTUS nominee once had the nickname "the locomotive" because she liked to pull trains.

Seem far fetched?

It would be thrown in the trash bin if it was pitched as the plot to a far fetched Hollywood conspiracy theory movie for being *too* far fetched and just plain freaking idiotic.

My point here is the Democrats have a very long history of making allegations of allegedly sordid sexual impropriety against Republicans without any actual evidence.

Sworn witness testimony *is* evidence Captain Clueless.

You keep refusing to a knowledge the FACT that this woman didn't ID Kavenaugh as the alleged groper until he was nominated.

gcomeau wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:We also have laws against defamation, libel and slander in this country. If Kavenaugh fails to get confirmed because of these unsubstantiated accusations, he has good cause to file a lawsuit against the bitch for lost wages and damaged reputation.

He would be laughed out of court... of course the guy who is opposed to having any investigation into these incidents or sworn testimony of witnesses heard or to having himself submitted to a polygraph over them is never in a million years going to file that lawsuit.

Guess why genius.

Kavenaugh's confirmation to his current Judicial position has been prolonged and acrymonious.

Which is a natural consequence of nominating a man like Kavanaugh to such a position in the first place.

Gorsuch is extremely conservative. He practically sailed through. So you don't get to claim this is just the Libs being mean to the right.

Kavanaugh is grossly unfit for this position.

This woman has had abundant opportunity to make her accusations public. She didnt. Why not?

Have you spent the entire freaking #metoo era in sensory deprivation or something? How is it possible you are still clueless enough to ask that question?

Consider the possibility that this woman who IS an extremely partisan Democrat operative decided to weaponize herself by seeking therapy for an imaginary incident that doesnt qualify as a crime committed by an unspecified perpetrator. Then when Trump appoints a SCOTUS nominee who could concievably be connected to the time and place not specified in her vague statements to her therapist, she goes public with the accusations naming the nominee as the alleged perpetrator of the non-crime to sully his reputation.

How much you bet that the Democrats have a stable of studs prepared to accuse any female SCOTUS nominees of being sexually promiscuous? They have a cadre of guys who will attest that any female SCOTUS nominee once had the nickname "the locomotive" because she liked to pull trains.

Seem far fetched?

It would be thrown in the trash bin if it was pitched as the plot to a far fetched Hollywood conspiracy theory movie for being *too* far fetched and just plain freaking idiotic.

My point here is the Democrats have a very long history of making allegations of allegedly sordid sexual impropriety against Republicans without any actual evidence.

Sworn witness testimony *is* evidence Captain Clueless.

Gorsuch didn't live in her neighborhood, so any charges she might have brought against him would have been so obviously false that even you could figure it out.

I am very much aware of the MeToo movement. Harvey Weinstein was renowned for his casting couch for decades. A lot of Hollywood starlets willingly had sex with him to gain his favor and advance their careers. This gave untalented harlets, I mean starlets, a competitive advantage over talented actresses who had morals. They didn't complain because they didn't want to nuke their careers. Weinstein got so arrogant that he apparently forced himself on a few starlets who weren't willing to put out to get a part. Now every harlot who willingly put out to him is complaining. Some untalented harlots who never had the opportunity to put out to Weinstein are also complaining that they didn't get a part because they didn't put out.

In case you're too brainless to figure it out, the MeToo movement which had a valid point inevitably​ and almost immediately degenerated into a modern analog of the Salem Witch trials. A lot of innocent women were literally burned at the stake because the basic premise of justice was cast aside to appease the hysterical mob. This witch hunt is different only because it targets men.

The E wrote:Speaking of people not believing Kavanaugh:

Look at these women.


Those are not the faces of people convinced that Kavanaugh is the victim here.

You must be a Sphynxian Treecat in disguise?

Who are these women?
MeToo activists?

TFLYTSNBN wrote:..snip..
I am very much aware of the MeToo movement. Harvey Weinstein was renowned for his casting couch for decades. A lot of Hollywood starlets willingly had sex with him to gain his favor and advance their careers. This gave untalented harlets, I mean starlets, a competitive advantage over talented actresses who had morals. They didn't complain because they didn't want to nuke their careers. Weinstein got so arrogant that he apparently forced himself on a few starlets who weren't willing to put out to get a part. Now every harlot who willingly put out to him is complaining. Some untalented harlots who never had the opportunity to put out to Weinstein are also complaining that they didn't get a part because they didn't put out.

Chauvinistic ranting detected.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:In case you're too brainless to figure it out, the MeToo movement which had a valid point inevitably​ and almost immediately degenerated into a modern analog of the Salem Witch trials. A lot of innocent women were literally burned at the stake because the basic premise of justice was cast aside to appease the hysterical mob. This witch hunt is different only because it targets men.

Although I can agree that #metoo was out of control for awhile for which I lay mostly the blame on the media but your comparison fails on one important fact - there never where any witches.

TFLYTSNBN wrote:
Who are these women?
MeToo activists?

While I don't know all of their identities, the red-haired woman behind Kavanaghs name tag is his wife.

The E wrote:

TFLYTSNBN wrote:
Who are these women?
MeToo activists?

While I don't know all of their identities, the red-haired woman behind Kavanaghs name tag is his wife.

I doubt they have an open door policy for senate hearings.

They actually they do have an open door policy for public hearings. As a practical matter, the audience gets planted with Senate staff.