In regards to the massacre itself, something that is often overlooked is that the weapons that were purchased by Martin Bryant were purchased illegally anyway! He did not have a firearms license, and given his mental health would not have qualified for one in the first place! Sadly, something politicians seem to forget is that criminals, by definition, do not obey the law!
If the government had spent the money it did on the buyback scheme on checking up and enforcing the already existing laws regarding firearms sales, they would have been much more effective.
namelessfly wrote:I would refer you to a well researched article that cast doubt on the presumption that the lack of mass shootings was a consequence of the weapons ban.
http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php ... 27&EXT=pdf
New Zealand also had zero mass shootings after the ban was imposed in Australia even though New Zealand did not impose a similar ban.
IMHO, improvements in mental health care which contributed to reduced suicides was a factor.
In the US, the lack of effective mental health care combined with cultural inhibitions that discourage suicide are a major factor contributing to mass shootings.Annachie wrote:The lesson from the Rodney King riots was not "Need automatic weapons", and it's a sad thing that people seem to think that.
The lesson from from various school shootings in not "arm the teachers"
Nor us the lesson from a guy shooting up a bar "Allow concealed weapons"
The lesson from Port Arthur was ban semi auto's (gross generalisation) and it worked. 1 masacre a year before the ban, zero since. Not average, actually zilch in about 15 or 16 years. Despite gangland wars and bikie gangs fighting each other.
Hell, this centuary in the state I live in we've had one cop killed by a firearm in the line of duty. Wisconsin (closest in pop size I think) has had something like 20.