pokermind wrote:Civil discussion of issues, even willingness to see the other side's point of view are things of the past, and is dividing this nation in an alarming manner.
Poker
This I heartily second. We have become a nation of extremists, all shouting "my way or the highway". We're enamored of slippery-slope fallacies, in this case the idea that ANY government regulation of gun ownership will ultimately lead to confiscation and tyranny. No one wants to discuss possible solutions in the middle, it's either "ban all firearms" or "AK-47s for everyone"! If you suggest, as I do, mandatory training and criminal/psych background check for ownership licensing, serial-number registration for every firearm, all sales and transfers to be recorded (only between licensed persons), and liability for misuse of weapons registered in your name, ban supporters object because some people would still have guns, and 2nd Amendment enthusiasts object because they don't want the government knowing anything about their arsenals.
People seem to ignore two established legal principles:
1. No constitutional right is absolute. Free speech does not allow slander. Freedom of religion does not allow human sacrifice. Rights are subject to regulation for the protection of others.
2. With rights comes responsibility. If you run a newspaper, you are liable if you knowingly publish false information that damages someone. The right to travel (US v. Wheeler, US v. Guest) does not allow you to drive 150 MPH on the interstate.
I keep hoping for a great centrist movement to develop in the US, but it's much easier to get people worked up with extremist rhetoric than with common sense and compromise.