cthia wrote:Is this an inconsistency or does it infer that Tankersley was a two-timer? Or did the long legs of Harrington lure Paul away from Cindy? Or are we to just assume that their relationship had simply run its course through a rocky debris field?
Cindy was the assistant to Vice Admiral of the Red Sir Craig Warner, assigned to the space station Hephaestus. She started to see Commander Paul Tankersley of HMS Warlock when the vessel was in refit at the shipyard. Admiral Warner did not think anything of it, because he thought that Cindy had good sense. (HH1)
munroburton wrote:I doubt it was much more than post-work drinks and unwinding. There wasn't any trace of baggage or deception suggested via either Honor or Nimitz's psi sense.
My apology, I should have posted the wiki informant from Tankersley's blurb.
wiki informant wrote:In 1900 PD, he held the rank of Commander and was assigned as executive officer of the heavy cruiser HMS Warlock. When Warlock was in refit at HMSS Hephaestus, he did most of the work for Captain Pavel Young. During the time, he started dating Vice Admiral Craig Warner's assistant, Cindy. (HH1, HH3, OBS) When the Warlock was undergoing repairs, he would purposely slow the work in order for the ship to miss the events occurring in Basilisk.
Following the events at Basilisk, Tankersley caught the eye of Admiral Warner. He was promoted to Captain (junior grade) and transferred to the Bureau of Ships. Several years later, he was assigned as a member of the repair team at Hancock Station. He oversaw the repairs to HMS Nike, and used the private on-board gym. There, he ran into Honor Harrington and became Harrington's sparring partner. He and Harrington began a relationship which soon blossomed into love. (HH3)
Which clearly states they were dating. And implies that he ran into Harrington pretty much on the heels of it.
Also Warner wouldn't have been slightly concerned over just drinks and idle chitchat. It could have just been casual sex though. On your point that Nimitz might've picked up on any deception, yes. As far as Honor though, no way. Honor was head-over-heels hit way over the right field wall out of the park in love with Tankersley. When you fall that hard for someone, you can't see that they are a monster even if they are dripping green goo all over you and even when all of your friends are screaming "Monster! Monster!" Said person can sell you the huge army of Costa Rica during that time of floating on a cloud of rubbish.
"Waitaminute! Costa Rica has no army!"
"Too late, all sales are final!"
cthia wrote:There's an HMS Invictus and an HMS Invincible. Invictus means unconquerable or undefeated. We all know what invincible means but once these ships do suffer a defeat then what of the inappropriate name? Which shows why a ship's nomenclature designated after an intangible—and perhaps unrealistic ideal—instead of after a personage is a problem. Justa rambling.
munroburton wrote:I always thought ships named in such a manner were just begging for misfortune. Indeed, three of the real life Royal Navy's six Invincibles foundered due to bad weather and a fourth was lost in combat with 1,020 of 1,026 crew due to a magazine explosion rather early into the engagement.

Seems you'd at least learn to reload the gun with a different cartridge after a couple of misfires. I guess bigger made them more Invincible. Which only proves the old adage "The bigger they are, the harder they fall."
Or in this case "The bigger they are, the bigger the explosion."