The Founding Fathers would quarrel with each other,
and then accuse each other of Attempted Tyranny!
We all know about Federalists vs. Republicans.
Three years after writing the Federalist Papers together,
Madison and Hamilton were each convinced that the other
had betrayed them.
Six years after jointly working USA Foreign Policy as
Ministers to England & France, Adams & Jefferson "just
knew" that the other had sold out to the country he'd
been working in.
We all know what TJ called GW.
And then, within parties, there were:
Alex. Hamilton against John Adams,
which almost put Jefferson into the Presidency in 1796.
John Adams/Timothy Pickering.
Monroe against Madison, for the House in 1788.
(If Monroe had won, probability of Bill Of Rights would
have gone way wwaaayyyy down!)
All I remember off-hand, but there were many more.
Easier to remember the partnerships that remained:
Jefferson-Madison, and Adams-Marshall.
Sorry, can't think of any third.
HTM
WeirdlyWired wrote:What Would the Founding Fathers Do?

Yeah, like they had 100% agreement and never had to make compromises. I suppose we're lucky that Madison, Jay, and Hamilton wrote "The Federalist Papers, under the pseudonym Publius and actually published them in New York colonial newspapers and sort of explained the rationale behind the constitution. But, even reasonable people can reasonably disagree. and an activist court definition depends on whose fatted calf gets slaughtered for the feast.